On-Page Automation finds two problems most reporting never names. The first is a page-one ranking earning well under the click curve, which is a title problem, not a position problem. The second is two of your own pages splitting one query, which is you competing with yourself. Both are cheap to fix and almost never on anyone list.
On-Page AutomationPart of the SEO module. Switched on and off per account, so you never pay for a module sitting idle.
Expected CTR by position is calculated from your snapshots rather than an industry chart that does not match your market.
Page-one rankings landing well below that curve. The position is already won; the click is being lost at the title and description.
Two or more of your pages appearing for the same query. Google picks one, usually not the one you would.
Rewrite, merge, redirect or leave alone. A finding without a recommended action is just a chart.
Search volume: Google Keyword Planner, United States, pulled 31 Aug 2026. Every other number is measured on our own site.
The CTR curve and cannibalisation detection run on stored Search Console snapshots. Findings can be handed to a coding agent through the action-feed contract, which is how changes actually reach the site repo.
A page ranking on page one but earning far fewer clicks than that position normally earns on your site. The fix is almost always the title or description, not more links.
The curve is fitted from your own Search Console snapshots, not from a published industry table.
No. It produces the recommended change. Shipping it is a human decision, and on client sites it goes through a handoff branch.
Also in SEO: Keyword Discovery Automation · Rank Tracking Automation